Categories
Uncategorized

Canada 1971, Trudeau is outraged about Laporte’s kidnapping and murder, so the perps got 8 years in jail

A politician is kidnapped from his front yard and murdered and yet the confessed and convicted murderers get only 8 years in jail. We will explore today how this can happen. So slip on your smoking jacket, fill your pipe, take your first sip of your adult beverage, and sit back in your most comfortable chair. Welcome to todays offering from The Philatelist.

The stamp today looks older than it is. By the 1970s, most stamps including Canada’s offered bold colors. The only hints that this stamp is newer is the font that Canada is written in and the fact that 7 cents is too much to mail a letter in the earlier period. Perhaps the bland grey portrait of Mr. Laporte was thought in keeping with a mourning period. I think this is wrong. Turning him into a bland grey figure lessens the loss of what was a brutal crime where a man was targeted based on his moderate political views and for the crime of being willing to serve his province and country.

Todays stamp is issue A285, a 7 cent stamp issued by Canada on October 20th, 1971. The stamp honors Pierre Laporte a year after he was murdered. It was a single stamp issue. According to the Scott catalog, the stamp is worth 25 cents whether it was mint or used.

Pierre Laporte was a journalist, lawyer, and politician from Quebec. As a journalist, his work was instrumental in alleging corruption in the regime of then Quebecois Premier Maurice Duplessis. Allegations of impropriety should always be taken with a grain of salt when they come from political opponents and that was the case here. Mr. Laporte was an active member of the rival Quebec Liberal Party and later served in the Quebec National Assembly and was provincial minister of Labor when the Liberal party was in power in the 60s. Though not as radical as some, the Liberal Party in Quebec broke away from the national Liberal party of Trudeau and set up separate Quebec pension and health systems and nationalized the electric utility in Quebec. What it also did was favor remaining in Canada. For this sin, Laporte had to pay with his life.

The Front for the Liberation of Quebec was a radical communist group that sought the succession of Quebec from Canada. Further they wanted to establish and independent Quebec that was francophone and only francophone and that the country be an ethnically cleansed communist worker’s paradise. They had much support from left wing types and engaged in 160 outbreaks of violence that killed eight people.

Flag pf the FLQ. That red star really brings forth the French heritage

Mr. Laporte was playing football in the front yard of his home with his nephew when he was kidnapped at gunpoint. The FLQ declared him the Minister of Unemployment and Assimilation. Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau feigned outrage at the kidnapping and enacted special police powers to find the cell of the FLQ responsible.

Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in 1970 on TV announcing the roundup of the FLQ. He didn’t mention how short the jail terms would turn out.

The remains of Mr. Laporte were found eight days later having been strangled. FLQ support dropped as a result of the violence but Trudeau was nowhere man when it was time to see that the perpetrators of the kidnap and murder pay for their crimes. The death penalty was not possible in Canada at the time but sentences of life and thirty years were handed out to the for men who confessed and were convicted. This was just for show. The men served an average of 8 years in jail  and were even allowed to write books afterward that justified their actions and allowed them to profit from their crimes. One of the books was made into a movie partially funded by the film board of Canada. ‘Pierre Trudeau failed his people in allowing this to happen. I am sure his supporters will want to pass the buck on this but the buck stops with him.

FLQ people in the subsequent round up. The fellow would be able to shake his fist outside of police custody soon enough

Well my drink is empty. I wonder if the radical that was the young Pierre Trudeau led him to secretly sympathize with the FLQ or whether Laporte was too much of a like minded rival. Come again for another story that can be learned from stamp collecting. First published in 2018.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

The Prince who was assassinated after fighting for independence.

Welcome readers to todays offering from The Philatelist. So slip on your smoking jacket, fill your pipe, take your first sip of your adult beverage and sit back in your most comfortable chair. We have a story today about a Prince who was assassinated while fighting for independence.

The stamp today is African from the first years of independence of the country of Burundi. The stamps these years generally have a very optimistic look to them. Some of the style of USA President Barrack Obama was influenced by 1960s newly independent African countries. This is slightly different as the young leader on the stamp had already been assassinated.

This is semi postal issue B1, a 50 +25 centimes issue of the kingdom of Burundi that came out on February 15th, 1963. It depicts Prince Louis Rwagasone with his birth and death years of 1932 and 1961. It is part of a six stamp semi postal issue. The additional charge of 25 centimes was to fund a memorial and stadium in Burundi’s capital of Bujumbra. The memorial and the stadium were built and still stand today. According to the Scott catalog, the stamp is worth 25 cents cancelled. The stamp is both cancelled and gummed, indicating a issue not intended for mail use.

The royals in Burundi lasted through many colonial changes but were not able to keep the throne long into independence. Prince Louis’s father, King Mwambutsa IV took the throne in what was then German East Africa. He was a child at the time and there was a regent to wield power until the King could take the reigns in 1929. Meanwhile during World War I the area had fallen out of German hands and was now controlled by Belgium. Prince Louis left university in Belgium to return to Burundi to fight for independence. He formed a political party, the socialist Union for National Progress, UPRONA, and started boycotting Belgian shops and taxes. During this period he married a Hutu wife, the Royal family being Tutsi in order to smooth over tribal distinctions. The UPRONA was banned and the Prince was placed under palace arrest by the Belgians.

UPRONA won 80% of the vote in the election that Belgium allowed however and an independent kingdom was declared still under King Mwambutsa IV. He appointed Prince Louis the first Prime Minister of independent Burundi. However, Prince Louis was assassinated at his home later in 1961 by a Greek assassin who was accompanied by three Burundian members of a pro Belgian political party. All four were hung with out a full account of whether Belgium had a hand in the plot.

The King left power to his teenage son, and Prince Louis’s half brother Prince Ntare in 1966 who was then soon overthrown. The government in Burundi is Tutsi and 85 percent of the people are of the Hutu tribe. This has lead to many Hutu rebelians. King Ntare V attempted to return to Burundi in 1972 with the help of Uganda’s President Idi Ammin but was quickly arrested and executed. Former King Mwambutsa IV lived out his years in Switzerland. In 2012, Burundi sought return of his remains so he could be buried in his homeland and given a proper state funeral. His remains were dug up but ended up staying in Switzerland after a four year court case. He had directly stated in his will that his remains were not to return to Burundi.

Well my drink is empty and so it is time to open up the conversation in the below comment section. Burundi is the second most unhappy nation in the world, so it is understandable that they respect Prince Louis, who died before he had the chance to disappoint them. Even today, the day he was assassinated is a national holiday in Burundi. Come again tomorrow for another story that can be learned from stamp collecting.

Categories
Uncategorized

A young Architect designs a landmark then gets murdered by mallet

Welcome to todays offering from The Philatelist. So slip on your smoking jacket, fill your pipe, take the first sip of your adult beverage, and sit back in your most comfortable chair. We have an interesting story to tell of stately architecture, inflation, and jealous murder by mallet.

1935 is when this stamp was issued. When commemorative stamps were new and stately architecture could still be found  in newish settlements as it was of recent construction. The lithograph on the stamp shows trees that are no longer in evidence, the grounds now often hosting concerts. The building still stands and remains in use. They did recently remove some of the original murals that to modern eyes are perceived as being insensitive to Indians.

The stamp today in issue A85, a 50 cent stamp issued as part of an eleven stamp issue in various denominations. This stamp depicts the British Columbia Parliament Building in Victoria, British Columbia. According to the Scott catalog, the stamp is worth $6.00 in it’s cancelled state.

Before getting to the murder, this stamp requires a discussion of inflation from 1935 to today. This stamp has a face value of 50 cents. 50 cents in 1935 money equates to $9.06 in todays money. There is also a $1 stamp included in the issue. The high denominations indicate the use was intended for postage of packages.

The sad part of this is what it means to stamp collectors. This stamp is just way behind inflation, despite being an attractive stamp that depicts a landmark that is much beloved. My copy of the stamp came to me from my late Father’s collection. He had recorded a value of $4.50 from his catalog from around 1980. Therefore, in the last 35-40 years, the stamp has gone up 33% while inflation is about 9 times that. The meaning of that I hope is that a stamp like this has room to go much up in value if there is a renewed interest in stamp collecting. The Philatelist is doing his part to make sure this happens.

The British Columbia Parliament Building was authorized in 1893. The architectural competition was won by a 25 year old recent immigrant from England named Francis Rattenbury. He signed his plans ABC Architect and won. The building was over budget at $923,000, which of course seems great value today. The building was popular and Mr. Rattenbury received many commissions including the famous Empress Hotel in Victoria.

Mr. Rattenbury’s success peaked early. While in his 50s, he left his wife Mary and two children for a twice divorced 27 year old named Alma. His wife was left destitude to the extent of the electricity and heat being cut off at her house. The divorce was quite the big story in Victoria. Mr. Rattenbury found himself shunned in Victoria and had to return to England with his new wife.

Here the story gets even stranger. The Rattenburys hire an 18 year old chauffer who lives with them at their country house. He has an affair with Alma.  Soon Francis is found in his study having received repeated blows to the skull with a carpenter’s mallet. It took him four days to die. The chauffer is sentenced to death for the murder but the sentence is reduced to life in prison after many public appeals to the Home Secretary. The public felt that the young man had been put up to the crime by Alma. He ended up serving only 6 years as he was released early to serve in World War II. Francis Rattenbury was left for many years in an unmarked grave.  Alma was found not guilty of both murder and conspiracy despite having confessed. She later cut herself seven times with a dagger and threw herself in a river committing suicide.

The case is well known in England and has been made into a tv movie in Australia in 1956 and by the BBC in 1987 as Cause Celebre. There is also a Canadian opera.

Well my drink, and the second, are empty and so it is time to open the conversation in the below comment section. Have you ever hired a live in 18 year old chauffer? If so, how did that go for you? Come again tomorrow for another story that can be learned from stamp collecting.